AI / ML & Autonomy
Review evidence cards for a predicted anomaly, check safety rules, and choose a response — from ignoring the alert to entering a simulated safe mode — then debrief your decision.
Student can review telemetry evidence cards, apply a safety rule check to a proposed action, choose an appropriate response, and write a one-paragraph decision debrief.
Review evidence cards for a predicted anomaly, check safety rules, and choose a response — from ignoring the alert to entering a simulated safe mode — then debrief your decision.
Open Human-in-the-Loop Decision at `/twin/learn/activities/aiml_autonomous_safe_mode` — interactive evidence card review, action selector, safety rule check, and debrief panel (classroom simulation only; no real satellite commands).
Given a predicted anomaly and three evidence cards, write: (1) which cards support the prediction, (2) your chosen action, (3) one safety rule that governs that choice.
Teaching-grade software activity slot — not a flight simulator or certified propagator.
Step 1 — Choose a predicted anomaly
Step 2 — Review evidence cards
2 supporting · 2 neutral · 0 contradicting
attitude_error_deg
4.1° for 38 sSupportsExceeds 2° threshold and has not converged — strong indicator of control fault.
battery_soc_pct
72%NeutralPower is healthy — the fault is unlikely to be power-related.
packet_age_s
3 sNeutralPackets are fresh — comms is not the cause.
wheel_speed_rpm
0 RPMSupportsReaction wheel shows zero speed — may indicate wheel fault or command failure.
Step 3 — Choose an action
Step 4 — Write a decision debrief
Explain your choice in 1–2 sentences: which evidence cards influenced you most, and why did you choose this action?
Local-only. This text is included in your evidence when you copy or save.
Self-check · Local only
Local-only. No submission, no grade. Answers revealed here only.
Why should evidence cards be reviewed before choosing an autonomous action?
What is the purpose of a 'safety rule check' before executing an autonomous action?
In this classroom Track 7 teaching model, what does 'Enter Safe Mode (Simulated)' actually do?
Evidence capture · Local only
Local-only. No submission, no backend, no grade. Copy or screenshot to share.
Expected outputs learners should be able to show after the lab (Phase 9 evidence engine preview available).
Select a predicted anomaly and confidence level; review evidence cards (supporting / neutral / contradicting); choose an action; read the safety rule result; write a debrief.
Responses are not persisted in this preview unless a specific activity component adds storage later.
Give one scenario where entering safe mode too early wastes science, and one where waiting too long risks the spacecraft bus — explain how evidence cards would help you decide.
Run as a structured debate: two students choose different actions for the same anomaly, then each explains their evidence-card reasoning. Stress that asking for human review is always valid.
Suggested progression from the mission learning path. Links avoid missing activity routes.
Track 7 mini-course complete — revisit the full eight-track map, then Student Mode or Demo Pack for reviewer-ready walkthroughs. Evidence stays local until you copy or share it manually.